What you’ll learn
- Organize by system and condition
- Log question-bank or case sessions
- Bring weak clinical topics back sooner
- Use one schedule across mixed resources
Build a clinically useful hierarchy
Create a subject for a course or block, groups for systems, and topics for conditions or mechanisms. For example: Cardiology → Arrhythmias → Atrial fibrillation. Keep topics close to the unit in which you answer questions or explain a case.
Track resources, not duplicate them
A study session can be a lecture review, a question-bank block, a case discussion, or an existing flashcard review. After the session, rate the topic according to recall and reasoning. Spaced Repetition Tracker schedules the topic; your preferred resource remains where it already lives.
Use difficulty as triage
If you recognized a diagnosis but could not explain the mechanism or management, rate honestly. Hard topics return sooner. Easy topics move out, preventing familiar material from occupying the same time as dangerous gaps.
A weekly medical-school rhythm
- Add the week’s new conditions as topics
- Log retrieval after each question block or case review
- Clear due reviews in short daily windows
- Use the calendar view to plan heavy clinical days
- Review weak cross-system topics together at the weekend
Make a review plan for your own topics
Put the method into practice with our free spaced repetition schedule calculator. Enter your exam date and topics to get a daily review plan you can download to your calendar.
Research behind the method
Spacing and retrieval are well-studied learning principles, but no app or schedule guarantees a particular academic result. Use the research as a foundation, then adapt the workload to your material, deadline, and feedback.
Frequently asked questions
Does this replace Anki for medical school?
It can replace scheduling if you prefer questions, notes, or cases, or it can sit above Anki to track broader topics. It is intentionally not a flashcard editor.
Should I rate a whole question-bank block?
Rate the relevant topics separately when performance differs. One broad rating can hide a strong area and a weak one.